DSE 2010 doubt

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

DSE 2010 doubt

Halflife
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: DSE 2010 doubt

ElPsyCongroo
Write out the equation for income determination THOUGH, from the Keynesian point of view I mean, C+I+G, you'll realize C increases after the change because more income is in the hand of the worker and he consumers more, this in turn will eventually lead to a change in equilibrium income.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: DSE 2010 doubt

Halflife
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: DSE 2010 doubt

ElPsyCongroo
There would be no change in tY without the transfer because there is no change in Y.

Equilibrium Y changes with a change in the proportion of total income in the hand of the worker. Basically just solve for Y in the following:

Y= a(1-t)AY + b(1-t)(1-A)Y + I + G

a is the workers mpc < b, which is the capitalists mpc

A is the proportion of income the worker holds

The transfer changes A and therefore equilibrium Y
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: DSE 2010 doubt

Halflife
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.