Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
@46..there will be a stationary point at x=0 also
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
@45...for any C belonging to R++ ,plot x+y+xy=C or y= C-x/1+x..you will see that only Set U is convex...
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
please help with the marshall lerner ones..thanks :)
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In this first of all you have to find how the real exchange rate is defined the net exports (exports-imports) is calculated in terms of domestic goods so the term NX=X-IM/e is in terms of domestic goods X are in terms of domestic goods and IM are in terms of foreign goods so to convert Imports in terms of domestic goods we divide it by real ex rate From this try to find whether e=foreign goods/domestic goods or e=domestic goods/foreign goods....?? and then the defination of e in terms of nominal ex rate and ratio of prices.
Akshay Jain
Masters in Economics Delhi School of Economics 2013-15 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by kangkan
@46..sorry ..i made a msitake earlier..here is the graph...the function will the the green portions from -3 to -1 and the blue graph from -1 to 2
u will see that there are two local maximums/minimums(incidently none of them are stationary points) ![]() |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
thanks kangkan
![]() |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Dreyfus
Hey Vaibhav.
Can u explain how did u get this probability- 6/16 10/16 For q44.....when system of equations is homogeneous then there can be only two possibilities for solution, a unique solution (x=0) and infinitely many solutions(x≠0) If A is coefficient matrix and x is variable vector ie Ax=0 This can be only satisfied when x=0 A≠0, the case of unique solution and when x≠0 then A=0 ie the case of infinitely many solutions Probability of unique solution ie x=0 A≠0 is 6/16 Probability of infinitely many solutions A=0, is 10/16 For atleast one solution, 6/16 +10/16 =1 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Akshay Jain
Hi Akshay,
In this case epsilon=P/EP* so what would be the Marshall Lerner condition in this case? would it be dNX/d(epsilon) >0 or would it be <0 and why? ![]() Please help I have already spent hours on this question.. ![]() |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by kangkan
How to do ques 23?
My Q1 = 10, Q2= 7, but firm 1 cannot produce 10. What price will each firm quote? And will firm 2 produce rest of the quantity of firm 1? Thanks |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by kangkan
Please help me with 36, 37, 39. (Series01)
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Q39) Type1 Error: reject H0 when it is actually true which is given by alpha(a).
Now a=Pr(X<k), thus 0.09=k^2 (integrating the function in H0 over [0,k]). thus k=0.3. Now type 2 error: Accept H0 when it is actually false. So here we will have to find out the probability of H0 being false/ reject alternative hypothesis when it is actually true. Now Pr(X>K) for the function in H1 over [k,1]=[0.3,1]=0.49=type 2 error.
"I don't ride side-saddle. I'm as straight as a submarine"
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by sarawagisruti
@sarawagisruti
the real ex rate (e) in this ques is defined as foreign goods/domestic goods. Then only if we divide IM by e we will get the value of imports in terms of domestic goods (X-IM/e => trade balance in terms of domestic goods) accordingly e=EP/P* where E=foreign currency/domestic currency (say $/Rs) so a rise in e is associated with an real appreciation of domestic currency and a fall in e is real depreciation of domestic currency.
Akshay Jain
Masters in Economics Delhi School of Economics 2013-15 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi,
In this case what should the ML condition be. I took E= Rs/dollar so now what would be the Marshall lerner condition so then epsilon is P*/EP. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
since e=$/Rs and ML condition is satisfied
It implies that dNX/de<0 (a small increase in e is real appreciation which implies worsoning of TB)
Akshay Jain
Masters in Economics Delhi School of Economics 2013-15 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Even I thought so, but if I take this as the ML condition the answer to question 58 is coming out to be b) but sir has given a) as the answer. Could you please solve this set once Q 58-60 of 2012 paper.
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yes 58 is coming out -vly sloped schedule by logic as well as by mathematics......actually 1 of my snrs also (passed out) solved this question and he is also getting the same ans.....i dont no vy dse has given (a) as the correct option
Akshay Jain
Masters in Economics Delhi School of Economics 2013-15 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yes actually it should be negatively sloping but then again if we take it as -ve sloping there might be no solution to question 60.
![]() |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
For 60 u got 2 equations
1. Y=IS(e), IS relation Y as a function of e 2. Y=LM(e), LM relation Y as a function of e now for eqm value of e, equate above equations IS(e)=LM(e) and den find out from this de/dG and de/dMbar figure out the signs of above 2 partial derivatives and u vl get ur answer
Akshay Jain
Masters in Economics Delhi School of Economics 2013-15 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Haan..Thanks Akshay
![]() |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Akshay Jain
Hi Akshay for q59 ....the uncovered interest parity as defined by Blanchard is
![]() And the equation of interest parity in the question is ![]() But why the sign with change in exchange rate differs? M I missing something here? Plz help |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |