Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
|
ISI 2004
1 a 2 b 3 c 4 a 5 c 6 d 7 b 8 c 9 c 10 a 11 d (the series converge to 1 which is not a number between 0 and 1) 12 c 13 c (There is a typo in the problem, I have computed x(∂u/∂x) + y(∂u/∂y)) 14 d 15 c 16 a 17 b 18 c 19 b 20 a 21 b 22 d 23 d 24 a 25 c 26 c 27 a 28 d 29 d (ab ≠ 2a + b - 2) 30 b |
Loading... |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
How do we solve 30th question? I am getting (a) for it............
|
Loading... |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's b only. Consider x=-4 and x=-1
at -4, it's negative and at -1, it's positive. rest first order derivative says it ahs stationary values at -1 and 1. But at those ponits and even between them, it never cross x-axis. Cheers |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks.. got it.. I just assumed that min is at +1.. so value is never negative.. :p
and Have u been able to solve Q no. 12th and 28th .. ???? I am putting questions here for convenience... 12. Consider the function.. f(x)= (x^t-1)/(x^t+1) ... (x>0) The limit of the function as t tends to infinity; (A) does not exist; (B) exists and is everywhere contin (C) exists and is discontinuous at exactly one point; (D) exists and is discontinuous at exactly two points. 28. ![]() |
Loading... |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
hi aj:)
for 12th question by l"opital rule u can clearly see that limit is always 1 barring the case when x is itself 1...in that case limit is 0....so limit exists everywhere and discontinuous at only one point...:) sry but i spent hours on next question using log nd lopital but to no avail...:(( |
Loading... |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
pls tell me how u solved 11 and 21:)
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ohhh..its asking if limit is continuous.... I was checking continuity of function... :/
and for 11th.. 1.1/2 + 1/2.1/3 + 1/3.1/4 + ...........1/n.1/(n+1) ..... each of these terms become... like 1/n-1/(n+1) (1-1/2)+(1/2-1/3)+(1/3-1/4) ..... so adjacent terms will cancel.. like -1/2 with 1/2 .... leaving only the 1 in beginning.. so series converges to 1.... and for 21st.. I don't know how to do this minimum distance questions..so, my solution is super clumsy... so what i did was...I drew this y=x^2 curve ..and the line .. y=2x-4.... and saw all the options... like see the distance between line and these points.. and marked the one that looked minimum ... :p so.. both (1/2,1/4) and (1,1) .. looks like the answer... so... cant draw graph here.. but we need the length of perpendicular from given line to these two points.. for this we need the point on line from where the perpendicular starts... lets take point (1,1) first... our given line had slope of 2..so thats tan theta.. and perpendicular has slope tan(90+theta) = -tan theta = -2 so we have slope of perpendicular..i.e. -2... and a point on perpendicular.. i.e. (1,1) .. so equation becomes.. y=-2x + 3 and intersection of this perpendicular and given line gives us the point on first line from where the distance has to be measured... the point is.. (7/4, -1/2) .. and distance is 720/16^2... I did same for point (1/2, 1/4) ... and got the distance as .. (1021/16^2) ... so 1st is less.. so that's the answer .. (1,1) I tried my best to explain this.. hope u get it.. p.s.: i just did calculations again, so they might be wrong.. .. but that was what I basically did.. and if u find some neat way to do it..do temme! :) |
Loading... |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The answer is (d) for Q. 28
take exponential and write it like e^{ 1/x^2[sinx-x]/x} u use sinx series sinx= x-x^3/6+..... answer is d only. |
Loading... |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
hi aj..:) well that was fab...but fortunately i have got a shorter method....
we have a formula of perpendicular distance from a given point to a given line.... D= { ax+by+c/under root a^2+ b^2} this whole expression is within mod now can take the point on curve as (x1,y1) since this given point lies on y=x^2....we have y1=x1^2 put these values of (x1,y1) for (x,y) and u get D in terms of x1 only....now just minimise d nd u get x1=1 which implies y1=1 hope u find it crispier..:PPP |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hey how did we find the solution for question 3 about real roots? Please help.
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
@ritu.. ahhhh awesome...!!!
![]() @aditi... take derivative... its always +ve.. function is strictly increasing.. so passes through x axis only once... |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Please explain Q.no. 5 ?
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by AJ
Hi, I meant question 3 not 30
f(x) = (x-a)^3 + (x-b)^3 + (x-c)^3 the number of real roots for f(x) = 0 is A. 3 B. 2 C. 1 D. 0 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi, I also meant q.no. 3
f'(x) = 3(x-a)^2+3(x-b)^2+3(x-c)^2 f'(x)>0 therefore, function is strictly increasing... So, it can cross x-axis only once... |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Perfect, got it. Thank you so much :)
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
:)
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
plz explain question 28 again.....
i didnt get expresiion e^{ 1/x^2[sinx-x]/x} ,,,sholudnt it be e^[1/x^2*ln (sinx/x)] ? |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by AJ
Question no.5 @ AJ
From equation (i) we have: y = 2 + 3x and x = -2/3 + (y/3) The regression coefficients beta_yx and beta_xy are respectively 3 and 1/3 Therefore correlation coefficient rho would be simply the square root of product of the beta's i.e 1 Similary for equation (ii), you get the beta values as 4 and 1/4, the product of which yields 1 again. Hence option (C) |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Amit Goyal
Can someone plz help with Q.15
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Chinni18
Like this... wont we always get 1 as the product of both regression coefficients..??
we take 1 equation.. if its linear.. bxy is simply slope when y is dependent.. and byx is slope when x is dependent.... so both will be inverse of each other... product will always be one..... |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |