ISI 2017 PEB

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
64 messages Options
1234
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Halflife
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Diya
I am getting 6750 as well. And that's why I chose A :/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Halflife
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Econ17
In reply to this post by Halflife
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Econ17
In reply to this post by Diya
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Halflife
In reply to this post by Econ17
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Econ17
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Halflife
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Econ17
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Seecha
In reply to this post by Halflife
YAA EVEN I ALSO THIINK SO (D) IS CORRECT
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Seecha
In reply to this post by Halflife
ME..
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Halflife
In reply to this post by Econ17
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Halflife
In reply to this post by Seecha
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Halflife
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Econenthusiast
In reply to this post by Halflife
Oh no, not a problem at all!
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Econenthusiast
In reply to this post by Halflife
Halflife, the option tells that at every Pareto optimal allocation total milk production is 8000. How can that be ?, Pareto optimal allocations can be anywhere along the line x=y. Moreover even if we get 8000 whether or not that is the actual optimal allocation depends on the initial endowment.. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Algaeconomics
In reply to this post by Econenthusiast
Yeah we assume that social improvement has happened if total surplus increase because then the increased surplus can be redistributed between the agents and everyone can be at least made better off..
Nak
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Nak
11- 14 anyone?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

sneha
In reply to this post by Halflife
@halflife In 3rd degree price discrimination,we equate the marginal revenues but here we cannot do so because in the second market e>-1 i.e -0.10 which implies the MR<0.Also, when we equate the marginal revenues we assume MC in both markets to be equal.But since MR<0 in 2nd case we cannot equate it to positive MC and hence to the MR in first market.

So,by the intuition that elasticity is more in the first market it is feasible to lower the price to ensure more profits and raise the price in the inelastic mkt demand. so option (D)

Hope you got it.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ISI 2017 PEB

Halflife
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
1234