Login  Register

Question from MSQE 2011

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
11 messages Options Options
Embed post
Permalink
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Question from MSQE 2011

Rajat
112 posts
Consider two consumer with identical income M and utility function U=xy where x is the amount of restaurant good consumed and y is the amount of any other good consumed. The unit prices of the goods are give. The consumers have two alternative plans to pay the bill. A: Each pays for what she consumes. B: both pay one-half of the bill amount.

1) Find equilibrium consumption under plan A.
2) Find same for plan B.
3) Explain the difference if any.

Please help. Not clear about the approach. Thanks !
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: Question from MSQE 2011

Rajat
112 posts
Friends, please help here.
I do not come from economics background. Hence, although I am able to tackle such economics questions based on common sense, I need to learn what is the correct/appropriate approach that should be followed in the final examination.

Moreover, given the unavailablility of mock tests for ISI entrance examination, this forum is my (and possibly of many others) best shot at understanding from others.
Zen
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: Question from MSQE 2011

Zen
23 posts
In reply to this post by Rajat
I am also stuck in this. I have found the first two answers, but I need some help in the explanation. Can anyone check if the answers are correct and provide the required explanation?
Plan A: For each consumer: x=M/(2*price of x), y=M/(2*price of y).
Plan B: For each consumer: x=2M/(3*price of x), y=M/(3*price of y).
I cannot explain the difference. I just used Lagrange multiplier method.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: Question from MSQE 2011

hoouin
21 posts
This post was updated on Apr 03, 2015; 4:24pm.
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Zen
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: Question from MSQE 2011

Zen
23 posts
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: Question from MSQE 2011

onionknight
206 posts
Your solution is correct. Both will end up spending 2M/3 on the food. I got the same answer when I solved this problem using game theory. Since both consumers think that only half of the load of anything that they order (that they wouldn't order when they were eating alone) would fall on them, they wastefully end up spending too much on food and end up with a lower utility.

A similar example is given here: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/diners-dilemma.asp
Zen
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: Question from MSQE 2011

Zen
23 posts
Thanks for the confirmation, onionknight!
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: Question from MSQE 2011

hoouin
21 posts
Ur answer is right . we have to solve simultaneously for x1 and x2 to get nash equilibirium...
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: Question from MSQE 2011

Rajat
112 posts
Guys, are you also covering Game thoery/ Nash equilibrium for the exam ???
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: Question from MSQE 2011

Rajat
112 posts
@zen, can you pls upload your lagrangian method solution
Zen
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: Question from MSQE 2011

Zen
23 posts