Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The cdf of a normal distribution is the error function, or erf(x). The graph looks like this
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Erf.html Now, imagine the graph shifted up by 0.5 (since probabilities are never negative). Basically, a symmetric graph. The mean is in the middle - 0.5 This is a very intuitive graphical way of looking at things, Im sure there is a more "mathematical" solution somewhere. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the reply Soumen, so the answer to be considered is -1/2 or 0 or 1?
Regards |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Amit Goyal
economics no 4.
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The wages must be equal for equilibrium. Does that help? On 09-May-2015 11:39 am, "Jim_Moriarity [via Discussion forum]" <[hidden email]> wrote:
economics no 4. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Could you explain a bit more.
I equated the marginal product of both the production functions. Got equilibrium L1, L2. Then? |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
X1/X2 = (L1/L2)^0.5 x (K_bar/T_bar)^0.5 On 09-May-2015 12:10 pm, "Jim_Moriarity [via Discussion forum]" <[hidden email]> wrote:
Could you explain a bit more. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't get the 3rd step. :( I get L1 and L2 in terms of K,T,L. On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, soumen08 [via Discussion forum] <[hidden email]> wrote:
... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by duck
If we fix 3 at third place how the no of ways would be 3!*3!*2!. Can u plz explain
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |