doubt on pareto efficiency

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

doubt on pareto efficiency

riyaf
25.8 (0) Col. Tom Barker is about to open his newest amusement park,
Elvis World. Elvis World features a number of exciting attractions: you
can ride the rapids in the Blue Suede Chutes, climb the Jailhouse Rock
and eat dinner in the Heartburn Hotel. Col. Tom gures that Elvis World
will attract 1,000 people per day, and each person will take x = 50−50p
rides, where p is the price of a ride. Everyone who visits Elvis World is
pretty much the same and negative rides are not allowed. The marginal
cost of a ride is essentially zero.

(e) What is the Pareto ecient price of a ride? Zero.
(f) If Col. Tom charged the Pareto ecient price for a ride, how many
rides would be purchased? 50.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubt on pareto efficiency

Granpa Simpson
Wats the doubt..??..the answers are given 0 and 50..use necessary condition for Paretto efficiency and you will get the answer...!!!!!
 "I don't ride side-saddle. I'm as straight as a submarine"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubt on pareto efficiency

SoniaKapoor
In reply to this post by riyaf
Subhayu..pls explain me the soln...m not getting it
MA Economics
DSE
2014-16
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubt on pareto efficiency

Granpa Simpson
The necessary condition for paretto efficiency is perfect competition...so use p=MC, which gives 0 price, now put p=0 and obtain the value of q as 50...!!!!
 "I don't ride side-saddle. I'm as straight as a submarine"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubt on pareto efficiency

Arushi :))
In reply to this post by SoniaKapoor
Hey ,
this person is a monopolist and hence he is charging according to MR= MC.
Monopoly outcome is not efficient because both can be made better off
But the pareto efficient outcome is in perfect competition
where P= MC,Mc is given to be zero.
Hence, pareto efficient price is zero
x= 50-50p= 50
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubt on pareto efficiency

Arushi :))
@subhayu
we replied at the same time :D
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubt on pareto efficiency

Granpa Simpson
@Arushi;...
 "I don't ride side-saddle. I'm as straight as a submarine"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubt on pareto efficiency

The Villain
In reply to this post by riyaf
Thanku subhayu and arushi
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubt on pareto efficiency

SoniaKapoor
In reply to this post by riyaf
thanxx guysss
MA Economics
DSE
2014-16