doubtsss

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
14 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

doubtsss

SoniaKapoor
q1 The demand for spring water is given by P = 1000- Q. Assume that the cost of
production to be zero. What is the equilibrium price for the industry if there are four
firms in the industry?
a) Rs. 800
b) Rs. 200
c) Rs.100
d) Rs.1000


q2 Of the production functions, which one of the following represents decreasing
returns to scale?
a) Q = 2K + 3L +KL
b) Q = 20K^0.6^L0.5
c) Q = 100 + 3K +2L
d) Both a) and c) above

MA Economics
DSE
2014-16
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubtsss

Dreyfus
q2,....c)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubtsss

Akshay Jain
In reply to this post by SoniaKapoor
The equlbrm price in the industry will be 200
Akshay Jain
Masters in Economics
Delhi School of Economics
2013-15
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubtsss

SoniaKapoor
Vaibhav,Akshay pls give ur explanationsss
MA Economics
DSE
2014-16
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubtsss

Homer Simpson
In reply to this post by SoniaKapoor
Shouldnt 2 be (d) ?

And for 1, even (a) doesnt seem wrong. Akshay, can you explain how you got 200?
“Operator! Give me the number for 911!”
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubtsss

Economics student
In reply to this post by Akshay Jain
Please explain your answer Akshay. I agree with Tsuki, even a doesn't seem wrong.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubtsss

econ14
In reply to this post by Akshay Jain
hey akshay plzzz explain q1.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubtsss

econ14
In reply to this post by Homer Simpson
@tsuki how did you do q2....plzz help
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubtsss

Dreyfus
In reply to this post by Homer Simpson
@tsuki....production function F(K,L) = 2K + 3L + KL has inc returns to scale....
As F(tK,tL) > t*F(K,L)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubtsss

Homer Simpson
thanks, its 1(c) for sure.
“Operator! Give me the number for 911!”
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubtsss

Akshay Jain
In reply to this post by Homer Simpson
I used the cournot competition in case of 4 firms and since all the frms face equal MC of 0 and same mkt demand curve....In eqm they vl produce eqaul quantities....
P=1000-(q1+q2+q3+q4)
evey frm i will try to mazimze total profit (w.r.t. qi) = 1000qi-(q1+q2+q3+q4)*qi
qi*=200 for all qi and thus
P=200
Akshay Jain
Masters in Economics
Delhi School of Economics
2013-15
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubtsss

Akshay Jain
In reply to this post by SoniaKapoor
In ques 2 just apply the defination of returns to scale (the effect on output by doubling the inputs)
for convinience give arbitrary values to K nd L in all the 3 functions
now double those arbitrary values of K nd L and see whether the output increases by factor 2/>2/<2
option C will satisfy the <2 case....that is decreasin returns to scale
Akshay Jain
Masters in Economics
Delhi School of Economics
2013-15
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubtsss

Anjali
In reply to this post by Akshay Jain
Akshay I didn't get your explanation. Could you please elaborate ?
"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubtsss

Anjali
In reply to this post by Akshay Jain
*for ques 1 !
"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."