how to read it ??simple doubt on pareto optimalty

[hs]

how to say which alternative is pareto optimal

[hs]

set s {a,b,c,d,e}
set t {a,b,c,d}

[onionknight]

In set S, by switching from alternative a to alternative e you can make both individuals better off. Another way of saying this is to say that alternative e is pareto superior to alternative a. So a is not pareto optimal with respect to set S. However, there is no allocation in set T that you can move to from a such that one of the individuals is better off and the other is at least as well off as before. Therefore, a is pareto optimal with respect to T.

[L]

Shouldn't this be the case for 2nd consumer in first example allocation:
e>b>a>c>d

Then, e will be the pareto superior alternative to a.

[onionknight]

e is pareto superior to a even if you consider the preferences given in the screenshot

[L]

yes, you are correct !