Re: JNU ECOM 2011 QUES 91-100

Posted by Noel on Mar 28, 2014; 10:16pm
URL: http://discussion-forum.276.s1.nabble.com/JNU-ECOM-2011-QUES-91-100-tp7585657p7585659.html

Statement given by A is inconsistent so it's safe to say that he's a culprit and if observed carefully only C directly implies in his antecedent that B has "cheated" whereas others assert of someone being guilty without mentioning the guilt..i may be wrong but there is no other way of knowing which is the accomplice or the cheater unless we consider C to be innocent which implies that D is innocent..hence B is the cheater and A is the accomplice