Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() d 1 gets (1,0) and 2 gets (1,1)
MA Economics
DSE 2014-16 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I also hve doubt on the lottery 1
part 2,quest 35
MA Economics
DSE 2014-16 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by SoniaKapoor
Is the answer d..?
"I don't ride side-saddle. I'm as straight as a submarine"
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This post was updated on Jun 21, 2014; 6:55pm.
In reply to this post by SoniaKapoor
As far as my logic goes it shud be option d this is because option a cannot be the answer as it is not Pareto Efficient and hence cannot be competitive either, its not Pareto Efficient because the by moving to (1,0) and (1,1) agent A will be better off while B will be at the same utility level as compared to the original endowment bundle. Option b cannot be the answer as Agent B is getting worse off than the initial utility level. Similarly option c cannot be a competitive equilibrium because Agent A is getting worse off as compared to the initial bundle. However option d is pareto efficient because no agent can be made better off without making the other worse off. And so it is the only option left to be competitive.
"I don't ride side-saddle. I'm as straight as a submarine"
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by SoniaKapoor
ques 31
![]()
Akshay Jain
Masters in Economics Delhi School of Economics 2013-15 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
akshay why in this case the slope of budjet line would be same while you only posted in another tread that slope of b.line shoud lie between the slope of two ic's..
also u wrote that both should be better off from trade and here only 1 is getting better off |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanxx ...pls help me with lottery one also.
MA Economics
DSE 2014-16 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by hs
@himanshu.....in that solution...both shud be better off in that specific case.....dont generalize it...sry if I conveyed any wrng implication to u.....
in this case IC's cannot be made for consumer 1 so dont compare this case with the other case.... ![]() I hope u r getting me...
Akshay Jain
Masters in Economics Delhi School of Economics 2013-15 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
so in the case when we have ic's for both consumers ..both shud be made better off in eqm???
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
@himanshu...I cant generalize this...depends on the endowments and the utility functions of the consumers...
for example if 1 of the consumers has utility func as perfect compliments then its not neccessary that he will b made better off in comp eqm outcome......
Akshay Jain
Masters in Economics Delhi School of Economics 2013-15 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by SoniaKapoor
Ques 35
![]()
Akshay Jain
Masters in Economics Delhi School of Economics 2013-15 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanx a ton akshay!
MA Economics
DSE 2014-16 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
every set is part of the circle...so q55.d.....Z has bigger area than the disc....X has not contained all points that disc contains
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by akanksha
58. For Maxima or Minima, Df(x)=0, D^2f(x)-1=0=>D^2f(x)=1....so it is a convex function, minimum over (a,b)...
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by akanksha
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Akshay Jain
Masters in Economics Delhi School of Economics 2013-15 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
such a long solution
thanku so much akshay for the solution and your generosity really appreciate..thanks ![]() |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Akshay Jain
how have u made this ic 2...im a bit confused
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
@simar...this IC2 is for consumer 2 hu has perfect substitutes type utility function.....IC2 gives higher utility than IC1
Akshay Jain
Masters in Economics Delhi School of Economics 2013-15 |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |