Discussion forum
›
General
›
General Discussions
Search
everywhere
only in this topic
Advanced Search
ISI 2017 key
Classic
List
Threaded
♦
♦
Locked
338 messages
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
17
Abhitesh
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
45 55 combination is pareto eff
Akshay Pamnani
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
That is not the only Pareto Efficient outcome,how will you move them from (60,40) to (55,45).
Gaurav would not like that,would he?
So you would be making one person better off and the other one worse off necessarily,hence Pareto efficiency.
Abhitesh
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
Same argument can be made about 90 10 also. In my opinion the prof has a social planner role he will like maximize combined utility.
Akshay Pamnani
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
It can't be made for 90,10.Just draw the graph and see,both can be made better off there
Abhitesh
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
Yeah it can't be done for 90 10. But what about the social planner role of researcher. There is no reason for him to prefer one guy over other.
Akshay Pamnani
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
I don't think Pareto Efficiency cares about that,you are talking about equity really,equity is not present,but pareto efficiency is there.
Akshay Pamnani
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
In reply to
this post
by Abhitesh
3-How did you get b
I got a.
Abhitesh
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
Q1 - this is from welfare chapter of varian.
Q3 - In order to maximise social surplus use, P = MC = Q/2+31.
Akshay Pamnani
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
1-Are you saying the same question is given in Varian,I could not find it
Abhitesh
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
No... no that is the relevant chap.
Akshay Pamnani
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
Yeah I know that.
And yeah I messed up the 3rd question,Crap!
Akshay Pamnani
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
In reply to
this post
by Abhitesh
Check the 11th one,I got c
Abhitesh
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
In reply to
this post
by Akshay Pamnani
how are you expecting in peb anyway.
Abhitesh
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
In reply to
this post
by Akshay Pamnani
Q11 - Put G=tY+T0 i.e make budget balanced.
Daffodils
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
Yes. 11 c
Abhitesh
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
For a balance budget G=T=tY+T0
So Y=C+I+G
Y= c(Y-tY-T0)+I+ty+T0
Y= (c-ct+t)Y + I + (1-c)T0
Simplify this.
Akshay Pamnani
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
In reply to
this post
by Abhitesh
22)Should be (c) right?
Daffodils
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
22 c
Abhitesh
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
In reply to
this post
by Akshay Pamnani
let a>1
aL+10 < aL+10a = a(L+10)
((aL+10).aK)^1/2 < a(L+10)^1/2.K^1/2 = aF . This is decreasing.
So 22 should be c
PS - And for Q1 Prop 1 seems to be efficient.
Akshay Pamnani
Reply
|
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|
Re: ISI 2017 key
Yeah,seems right!
I only checked for a>1.
Crap!
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
17
Free forum by Nabble
Edit this page