Jnu 2015 after paper

[amalgamateking]

Was government and its tax structure mentioned in the question? If not, then why should we bring govt in?

[ABHI1994]

but it was given that it was simple keynesian model...

On 18 May 2015 at 09:19, amalgamateking [via Discussion forum] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Was government and its tax structure mentioned in the question? If not, then why should we bring govt in?

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discussion-forum.2150183.n2.nabble.com/Jnu-2015-after-paper-tp7597002p7597067.html

To start a new topic under General Discussions, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Discussion forum, click here.
NAML

[ABHI1994]

then should we not consider govt. role?

On 18 May 2015 at 09:20, SINGH ABHINAV <[hidden email]> wrote:

but it was given that it was simple keynesian model...

On 18 May 2015 at 09:19, amalgamateking [via Discussion forum] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Was government and its tax structure mentioned in the question? If not, then why should we bring govt in?

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discussion-forum.2150183.n2.nabble.com/Jnu-2015-after-paper-tp7597002p7597067.html

To start a new topic under General Discussions, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Discussion forum, click here.
NAML

[amalgamateking]

So? SKM can happen without govt

[amalgamateking]

why should we consider something that is not there? SKM can have import and export as well. Why arent you considering that?

[ABHI1994]

therefore it was in option about aggregate saving that it may increase or decrease?

On 18 May 2015 at 09:22, amalgamateking [via Discussion forum] <[hidden email]> wrote:

why should we consider something that is not there? SKM can have import and export as well. Why arent you considering that?

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://discussion-forum.2150183.n2.nabble.com/Jnu-2015-after-paper-tp7597002p7597071.html

To start a new topic under General Discussions, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Discussion forum, click here.
NAML

[amalgamateking]

3 of the 4 options are wrong. If that was there in the option then in this case it is wrong. If ONLY MPS fell then agg saving could have fallen or risen (this second case is reverse paradox of thrift in a way :P). But investment rises implies both output and agg saving have to rise