Macro doubt

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
13 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Macro doubt

Arushi
Suppose the economy is at full employment with a real rate of growth of 3%. If innovations in the banking system are reducing, ceteris paribus, the need for money at 1% per year, what rate of growth of the money supply would you recommend to achieve a long-run inflation rate of 4%?
a)  6%  
b)  7%  
c)  8%  
d)  9%

How do I go about solving this question?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Macro doubt

kangkan
i think we would need the elasticity of money demand for income growth..thats how it is solved in able bernanke
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Macro doubt

Ashima
Hey kangkan: This bernanke is available online? Do you have a soft copy of it? Can you please share?
ViV
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Macro doubt

ViV
I don't know its online link. But I have soft copy of it..
Tell me your Email-ID.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Macro doubt

Ashima
I got it :) Thanks anyways Viv :) By any chance do you have dornbusch ka soft copy?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Macro doubt

The Villain
In reply to this post by Arushi
Check here
www.google.co.in/search?q=dornbush+macroeconomics+pdf&btnG=

or

search in en.bookfi.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Macro doubt

SINGHAM
In reply to this post by Ashima
What is the answer? Is it 7% ?

I did this way: Afterall we are talking about loooooong run
So, to achieve 3% growth rate with 4% of inflation, we need 7% money growth:-)
Any rate at "If innovations in the banking system are reducing, ceteris paribus, the need for money at 1% per year" will not affect it!

I may be wrong Please answer, what is the right answer?
ViV
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Macro doubt

ViV
In reply to this post by Ashima
@Ashima : Yeah! I have...
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Macro doubt

Granpa Simpson
In reply to this post by Arushi
According to the quantity theory of money
% change in Md= % change in P+% change in Y-% change in V
Here % change in P= 4%,
% change in V=increase by 1% as money demand parameter decreases by 1%.
%change in Y= 3%
So overall growth in money demand is  6%, to reach equilibrium the money supply has to increase by 6%...isnt it so..??
 "I don't ride side-saddle. I'm as straight as a submarine"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Macro doubt

Economics student
In reply to this post by ViV
Can you please send me a copy of bernanke by mail? My email id is salonisrivastava511@gmail.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Macro doubt

kangkan
In reply to this post by Granpa Simpson
@subhyanau,,i think that formula is incorrect..because that formula assues that entire change in income translates into change in money..
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Macro doubt

kangkan
@ashmiam..i dont have soft copies..i can t read from the computer..its very taxing
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Macro doubt

SINGHAM
In reply to this post by kangkan
PLEASE ANSWER! WHAT IS THE TRUE ANSWER?