POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
108 messages Options
123456
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

Economics student
There was also a question on what will ensure that the monetary measures taken are taken and a prerequisite condition for them to successful was asked. I wrote low inflation, which i now think is wrong. What did you guys write?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

Ashima
I think I did not have this question, but low inflation should be right.

This is obvious na! When M increases and there is inflation, so monetary policy will become ineffecive.

Don't worry! I think its correct.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

Anjali
In reply to this post by Economics student
I also ticked low inflation.
@ Ashima I suppose our sets were same ? A ?
There was a question where a complicated consumption function was given and MPS was to be found . My answer was not matching with any of the options , so I made a wild guess. What about you all ?
"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

Ashima
Yeah mine was set A!

In that you needed to differentiate the function wrt Y!

As the slope is the MPC.

Then do 1-mpc= mps!

.2 something was the answer!

It wasnt exactly matching but the options werent close enough so I marked 0.2 something.

What did you mark?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

The Villain
yah .284 was the answer
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

Ashima
Hey ron even you marked no migration for that rural urban one?

And risk neutral? :(
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

Anjali
I marked 0.3
Actually I was confused between 0.2 and 0.3 , but finally I marked 0.3
"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

The Villain
In reply to this post by Ashima

it was risk averse...
and i'm not sure bt i guess it was no migration
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

Anjali
Why risk averse Ron ? The payoffs were coming to be equal !
"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

The Villain
A risk averse person prwfers a certain consumption to a fair gamble with same expected consumption..thats y i guess
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

AnonymousNow
@amita Yeah emailed them. No reply. Its India after all :-( It will be risk averse for sure. There is no need to do so much of calculation, simple reasoning clarifies that the person is risk averse. And regarding the MPS question I remember getting the exact answer. Now i dun rembr which one it was :-( I wrote that low inflation too. An expanding money supply would work only if the value of money is constant or high.


On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Ron [via Discussion forum] <[hidden email]> wrote:
A risk averse person prwfers a certain consumption to a fair gamble with same expected consumption..thats y i guess


If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://discussion-forum.2150183.n2.nabble.com/POST-SAU-Let-s-discuss-tp7586190p7586309.html
To unsubscribe from POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!, click here.
NAML

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

Ashima
Does anyone remember that question

x I Y

Y I Z

X P Y

What did you ppl mark? I cant even recall the options?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

Homer Simpson
This post was updated on .
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
“Operator! Give me the number for 911!”
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

Ashima
Transitive or not transitive? :(

I wrote not transitive!

Because actually it should be indifferent relation which should be not transitive, but i remember there was no such option.

So even i marked P not transitive.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

Homer Simpson
whoops i mean P is not transitive !!  my bad and yeah, xPz
“Operator! Give me the number for 911!”
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

AnonymousNow
what were the options of that question? transitive, non transitive and ????


On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Tsuki [via Discussion forum] <[hidden email]> wrote:
whoops i mean P is not transitive !!  my bad


If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://discussion-forum.2150183.n2.nabble.com/POST-SAU-Let-s-discuss-tp7586190p7586315.html
To unsubscribe from POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!, click here.
NAML

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

AnonymousNow
In reply to this post by Homer Simpson
There was one question "exchange swap"... What did you write ?


On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Jayshree Dutta <[hidden email]> wrote:
what were the options of that question? transitive, non transitive and ????


On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Tsuki [via Discussion forum] <[hidden email]> wrote:
whoops i mean P is not transitive !!  my bad


If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://discussion-forum.2150183.n2.nabble.com/POST-SAU-Let-s-discuss-tp7586190p7586315.html
To unsubscribe from POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!, click here.
NAML


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

Economics student
For swap I wrote spot exchange wala option. Is it correct? And there was no negetive marking right? and MPS option was 0.2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

AnonymousNow
Forex swap's answer should be that option where there was "loan" mentioned. dont remember exactly.. swapping of loans thru a currency.... :-( 
I cant remember what my answer for MPS was.


On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, saloni0511 [via Discussion forum] <[hidden email]> wrote:
For swap I wrote spot exchange wala option. Is it correct? And there was no negetive marking right? and MPS option was 0.2


If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://discussion-forum.2150183.n2.nabble.com/POST-SAU-Let-s-discuss-tp7586190p7586318.html
To unsubscribe from POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!, click here.
NAML

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: POST SAU : Let's discuss !!!

Amita_IITM
Actually we should all chill now and focus on other exams.
Good thing about SAU was that it gave us all a fair idea of our strong and weak points well in time for other imp exams. All of us have done more or less the same in SAU..
123456