doubt 2011

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

doubt 2011

madhur1987
for que 3 2011 in hammond its written there should be atleast 1 non zero scalar to show dependency.. why the ans is 2? also please if someone can give logic for que 4 thanx in advance:)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubt 2011

duck
Hi.. :)

Given v1, v2, ...vn are linearly dependent vectors...That is:
c1*v1 + c2*v2+...+cn*vn = 0 such that not all scalars (c1,c2..cn) are zero.
Now, suppose only c1 ≠ 0 and rest all are zero then, we'll have c1*v1 = 0 but this cant be possible as c1≠0 and v1 is a non zero vector. Hence, minimum number of non zero scalars = 2.
:)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: doubt 2011

madhur1987
In reply to this post by madhur1987
thnx a lot duck:)