Login  Register

dse 2004 .. duck pls see

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
17 messages Options Options
Embed post
Permalink
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

dse 2004 .. duck pls see

maahi
161 posts
This post was updated on Jun 18, 2013; 2:50pm.
Q4 how do we find d competitive eqm ?http://economicsentrance.weebly.com/uploads/1/1/0/5/1105777/26_jun_2004_option_a.pdf

won't it be px = py so dd becomes x= m/2px y = m / 2px  so m1= m2 = 1000 so they consume 500 , 500 . whats wrong here ??

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

duck
442 posts
Hi Maahi.. :)
You've found  just one of the competitive equilibirum allocation.
There are others competitive eqm allocation.

Demand for Agent 1: x1=y1= 1000px/px+py
Demand for Agent2: x2=y2= 1000py/px+py
For market clearing: It should be the case that x1+x2=1000 and y1+y2=1000.
And you can check the market clears for all postive price ratio.
Hence, the corresponding competive equilibirum allocations would be where x1=y1 and x1∈ [0,1000].
(45 degree line constitutes the Set of Competitive equilibirum allocation)




:)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

maahi
161 posts
This post was updated on Jun 18, 2013; 8:59pm.
thank you

http://discussion-forum.2150183.n2.nabble.com/dse-2004-td7345502.html;cid=1371563576470-610
for q 10 i did what u told but ans is nt coming can u recheck ?


30 . P (X<-1) = P BECAUSE OF SYMMETRY P (X >1) = p
p (x^2>1 intersectn Y^3 >1) = P(x^2 >1) P (Y^3> 1) =???


20 )  Y(n) = F(n)
d(w) = 1- w = s(w) =w ...>  1/2 = w

now d condition : mpl= w
so f'(n) = w = 1/2
since derivative is 1/2 and f(n) is a fn of n . f (n ) should be 1/2 n . so why is d correct ??


21>  if we are told to min then y is d ans in d max fn


19,24,25
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

Sumit
231 posts
In reply to this post by duck
Hi Duck,
Could you plz tell the right approach to get competitive equilibrium prices in q-6????..Is it can be done by hit and try only???

My approach
Agent-1 Demand for x1=999px/px+py
Agent-2 demand for x2=1000py/px+py

Now,For competitive equilibrium, Total demand for commodity x must equal to total supply.
==>[999px/px+py]+[1000py/px+py]=999.
Now, In this case as I put px=1 & Py=0...above equality satisfy.

At this price competitive equilibrium:  x1=999 and y1 belong [999,1000].






M.A Economics
Delhi School of Economics
2013-15
Email Id:sumit.sharmagi@gmail.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

duck
442 posts
In reply to this post by maahi
Q10) You must have done some calculation error.
Profits = (1-(3-4c/6)-(c/3))(3-4c/6) - c(3-4c/6) - (9c^2-13c/18)
Maximise it wrt c.

Q30) P(X<-1) = P(X>1) = p
Now, P(X^2 > 1) = P( 1<X<-1) = 2p
P(Y^3 > 1) = P(Y>1) = p   [As  X and Y are independent random variables with standard Normal Distribution]

Therefore,
P(X^2>1 & Y^3>1) = P(X^2>1) * P(Y^3>1)  [ As independent]
                                          = 2p*p  
                                          = 2(p^2)
:)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

duck
442 posts
In reply to this post by Sumit
Hi Sumit.. :)

No Hit and trial.
Your approach is correct. You must also check whether the market for Good y clears or not.
Another way: Plot the edgeworth and check for competitive equilibrium allocations.
:)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

Sumit
231 posts
thanks duck for prompt reply!!
M.A Economics
Delhi School of Economics
2013-15
Email Id:sumit.sharmagi@gmail.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

maahi
161 posts
In reply to this post by duck
thanks yaar pls tell d odr ques also
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

maahi
161 posts
In reply to this post by duck

Q10) You must have done some calculation error.
Profits = (1-(3-4c/6)-(c/3))(3-4c/6) - c(3-4c/6) - (9c^2-13c/18)
Maximise it wrt c.
 FROM WHERE DOES THIS TERM COMES ?

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

duck
442 posts
Profit = pq1-Cost-Investment cost.
:)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

maahi
161 posts
ohh  and d whole time i was thinking that investment cost is d only cost and that wud determine mc ..urgggh my bad

anyway . thank u .  you are d best
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

maahi
161 posts
In reply to this post by maahi
(45 degree line constitutes the Set of Competitive equilibirum allocation)
 always ? if yes , then why ??
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

duck
442 posts
Hey Maahi.. :)

Thats not the case always.
:)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

maahi
161 posts
how do we check for competitive eqm in case of complements ??
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

duck
442 posts
For Competitive equilibirum, we need to check two conditions:
(i) Given prices, Agents maximize their utility i.e find demand.
(ii) Market clears for all goods.

Now, whether goods are perfect substitutes, perfect complements or whatever, use the above way.

:)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

maahi
161 posts
This post was updated on Jun 23, 2013; 2:38pm.
ok suppose there is a min fn and price of one good is zero as its in excess . so how do we check here
similar doubt ::
http://discussion-forum.2150183.n2.nabble.com/DSE-2006-21-General-Equilibrium-Please-help-tp7582678.html;cid=1371992207772-101 
 pls see dis doubt also http://discussion-forum.2150183.n2.nabble.com/DSE-2011-Doubt-td7580645.html;cid=1371992207772-101
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: dse 2004 .. duck pls see

duck
442 posts
So just find the demand at zero price and then check whether the market is clearing or not.. :)
:)