Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yes using it we get 10%+3%-8%= 5 % according to ur formula
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3% infln is in foreign so 10=rer +3%-8% and it will give 15% apprcn
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
According to Interest Rate Parity theory, India's exchange rate should depreciate by 5% since inflation is 5% higher there. So India's currency has appreciated by 10% and it should depreciate by 5%, this implies real change is only 5% appreciation.
and the correct formula is (change in rer)/rer = (change in ner)/ner + foreign inflation - home inflation |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
also siddarth if you could pls explain 52-54 in little detail. I understood how to graph it. But if initial value is negative then why would x increase and approach zero?
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by kk
if u will put any -ve value of x in x^2-x dx/dt>0 which means function is increasing and it will approach 0 as it can't approach 1 bcoz between 0 and 1 value of dx/dt <0 and function will decrease
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by siddharth
for 55 the answer in C.....-x/x= -1 (notice we have lim tending to 0 minus)
for 56...(-2,-1)...hence option d...because greatest integer function is everywhere continous except at integer points... for 57....option is a....check google |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by kk
Sorry for 55 yes it will be c ..and thnx for 56 and 57..:)
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by siddharth
THIS IS FROM JNU SIS 2014....
A DEVALUATION OF A CURRENCY UNDER THE FIXED EXCHANGE RATE REGIME IS LIKELY TO HAVE NO IMPACT ON BALANCE OF TRADE IF A) HOME AND FOREIGN OFFER CURVES ARE ELASTIC B) HOME AND FOREIGN OFFER CURVES ARE INELASTIC C) HOME AND FOREIGN ELASTICITY OF THE OFFER CURVE SUM TO UNITY D) ALL OF THE ABOVE PLZ ANSWER THIS....I AM STUCK IN THIS.... ![]() |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by siddharth
q29 please explain once.
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by kk
Q 4 im getting (a) and 7 (d as 617/902 = 68%)
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by kk
q8 degree of openness = (X + M) / GDP so option (a)
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by siddharth
21 c by definition
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by siddharth
For Q.12 it should be c.
![]() So multiplier is not MPC, but the standard one, i.e., 1/(1-MPC) |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by siddharth
I don't know how to solve 63,64,65. These terms are not defined in standard macro books like Mankiw. From google I found out that,
revenue deficit = actual net revenue - expected net revenue fiscal deficit = total revenue - total expenditure primary deficit = fiscal deficit in current year - interest payments on previous borrowings Yet, I couldn't know for sure how to interpret info given in the question. Please, help. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
@dhruv
Revenue deficit=total revenue receipts - total revenue expenditure For 63....tax revenue (net to centre)+non-tax revenue - planned expenditure on revenue account - non plan expenditure on the revenue account Divide this by nominal gdp For 64....fiscal deficit is the borrowing by the govt Borrowings and other liabilities÷nominal GDP For 65.....primary deficit= fiscal deficit - interest payments So....borrowings and other liab - interest payments whole divided by nominal gdp |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by kk
For 63 revenue deficit = revenue expenditure-revenue receipts
For 64 f.d= total expend-(revenue receipts+non debt capital receipts) non debt includes rcvry of loans+ other rcpts For 65 pd= fd- interest payments |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Sris
Thanks Sris and Siddharth.
Also, I found that, borrowings & other liabilities = total exp. - (revenue receipts + non-debt capital receipts) |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by siddharth
For 31, shouldn't it be a? X>5 is sufficient for the inequality to hold.
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
que.31 ans. will be a On 11 May 2015 at 23:29, nishtha92 [via Discussion forum] <[hidden email]> wrote: For 31, shouldn't it be a? X>5 is sufficient for the inequality to hold. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Where can I find the JNU 2014 sss paper ?? Please share the link
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |