Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
^hey, its d
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by soimmoi
yes, I'm getting d as well :)
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
me too:)
have you also done 44 in the same manner? |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yes that seems like the right method, GDP = Sales + Net stock - Intermediate consumption
but I haven a doubt here, shouldn't we include the IC for firm A as well, since it forms a part of the total output produced ( even though its final sales is zero ) ? ( double counting doesn't become a problem since final good for A is not included ) so we'll get something like this 10,000 + (20-10) x 10 - (20-10) x 5 + (25-20) x 5 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This post was updated on Dec 12, 2017; 7:32pm.
SIS 2014,
24)Free trade is a optimal policy for: a) small country b) large country c) both a &b d) cannot say and if andyone could tell the for q25, 2014 sis too |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
won't be writing sis most probably.. I'll try answering them and will let you know the answers soon though, do you know how Q47 from sss 2017 is done ?, the one on monopoly. I'm getting infinite output since the MR will converge to zero only at an infinite level of output
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
because P = e^-Q
so, ln P= -Q 1/P (dp) = - dQ (dq/dp) (P/q) = -1/q so e= -1/q P[1-1/e) = MC mc here = 0 so, 1-1/e= 0 q= 1 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
thanks a lot soimmoi!!! :)
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by soimmoi
I think its (d). this optimal trade policy is explained a bit in krugman. I also think that if there are some people who gain then there are some people who also loose from trade. Optimal policy is very difficult to explain. Please suggest. Is this reasoning correct ?
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think so it's A
A because small country cannot effect ToT so, it cannot use any restrictions to improve trade balance whereas a large country can benefit in some cases from imposing restrictions on trade. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi, here it is written small or large country. In terms of capital or labour ? Or geographically ? Don't you think this reasoning say it must be (d)
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Econenthusiast
In an economy where 20% of income is taxed, consumption is 75% of post tax income. level of Investment is 500 and government expenditure is 1100 then, a) what is level of income my ans - 4000
b) what will be the level of income when with unchanged investment and tax rate, government expenditure is such that the budget is balanced? my ans - 3100 what I've done is Y= 0.75(Y - G) + 500 + G HERE, T = 0.2Y = G Kindly check if you people are also getting 3100 for b part |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I did the same here but my ans turns out to be 2500
Y = 3/4(4/5Y ) + 500 + 1/5Y Y = 3/5Y + 500 + 1/5Y Y - 4/5 Y = 500 1/5 Y = 500 Y = 2500 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hey! you're suppose to take t= g (balanced budget multiplier), Y has no role to play, you can't replace G by Y
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
okay but I equated G = 0.2 Y in the end, ans is still turning out as 2500
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Rayee
Can someone help me with this?
in an economy where all commodities are produced with labor alone, 0.5 units of labour is required to produce a unit of comdty A and 1 unit of labor is required to produce a unit of comdty B. if the international price of B is 2.5 units of A(and unaffected by how much the economy trades) and if the total amount of labor in the economy is 100 units how much of the commodities will the economy produce? a) 200 units of A and 0 units of B b)57.14 units of A, 71.04 units of B c)57.14 units of B, 71.04 units of A d)0 unit of A, 100 units of B is the answer d? under what circumstance will the economy produce both A and B? |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, It will produce both A & B, only when Price ratio is equal to opportunity cost
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
oh thanks, so suppose P_b/P_a = 2 instead of 2.5, how would the answer change?
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The countries will not trade in such a situation
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i'm a little confused :-(
i don't know trade much. what do you mean by opportunity cost? isn't that is terms of labor ratio? can you pleasee provide a mathematical explanation as to under what circumstance i might get answers like option (b) or (c)? |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |