Hey there Qwert, remember, Correlation does not imply Causation. It is simply a degree of the linear relationship between two variables. According to A, it is implying that income causes savings to change which is wrong. Similar argument for B. And since r=.2, very low, the plot will not lie on a straight line. So D is out of the question.
For 35, if your read the question, clearly R(P) is the range space of P and N(P) is the nullspace of P. Also from condition (b) of a projector, P(y+z)=y. But since P is a linear transformation, P(y+z) can be written as Py+Pz. {Pz=0, by definition}. Therefore LHS becomes Py.
Equating LHS with RHS we get,
Py=y.........(1)
Now, since y belongs to the range space, there exist an x belonging to R^n, such that Px=y.......(2)
Putting this in the LHS of (1),
we get P(Px)=y, or,
P^2 x=y.......(3)
From (2) and (3), we get P^2=P
(P.S. I'm hoping this is the right solution)
Hi. No, the question states that each factor is paid the mpl. That is, "w" is the wage received per unit quantity of labour supplied. "wL" would be total wage earnings, from the economy as a whole.
31) The first condition is simply MRS = Px/Py
For well Behaved prefrences we use the above condition. Also, we have to look at the bordered hessian matrix to check if the prefrences are covex or not.
bordered hessian matrix = 0 Px Py
Px Uxx Uxy
Py Uyx Uyy
The determinant is equal to the determinant of the matrix given in the question. AN for convex prefrences the determinant of the bordered hessian matrix should be <=0.
Uxx = D11U(X1,X2)
similarly for others
so answer is (d)
There are three options for each of the four testers to rank a particular kind of chocolate. The chocolate A gets the sum of ranks equal to four only for 1 combination i.e (1,1,1,1). On the whole, there are 3x3x3x3=81 options available to the for testers. Therefore, P=1/81