Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I tried to put the pts as far as possible from each other(one by one). the four pts will be at vertices and fifth pt. at the centre of square (where min. distance between any two points will come out to be root 2 which is not less than root 2.)
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by neha
It doesnt make a sense :/ ok can u give an example?
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Saish
Nicely done! :)
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by komal
but can you "always" find atleast 2 points like that?
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yes, we can always find two such thet the distance between them is less than or equal to root 2, because by placing the the five points farthest, i found distance(min.) between two points to be root 2, by placing them any other way min. distance will be less than root 2 , So, we can always find 2 pts whose distance is less than or equal to root 2
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by komal
but can't v put 5th pt on mid of any of the 4 sides? :/
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by anurag
acc. to me, p-q has to be one . it can't be negative. the concept of prime nos. i think is just for natural no. excluding 1.
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by anurag
then the min. distance will be 1 which is less than root 2.
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by deepak
Ok more intuitively, here goes,
if p-q = -1, and p>0 q>0, it means p is smaller than q. Then p^2 - q^2 will be less than 0 and this can't be prime |
Loading... |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by anurag
Actually i took -ve numbers like -13 as prime numbers (which has been refuted )and hence got -1 as well. but i guess thats not true.. so just 1 it is.
but why -ve are not prime,,, |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
:) I think it was mostly because prime numbers were established before the existence of negative numbers were acknowledged.
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by neha
so v hv found one placement of the 5 points such that the distance b/w no two of them is less than root 2. so statement c is also incorrect. looks like the question is wrong then.
thanks komal :D |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
and thanks 4 clarifying the question on prime numbers, guys :)
|
Loading... |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by komal
@komal,,
take the point that has been placed at the centre and take any of the points placed at the vertices. Now the distance between them is 1/root 2 < root 2. Isnt it? so we can find out atleast two points s.t the distance between them is less than root 2. so i think option c is correct. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by neha
p2 − q2 = (p+q)(p-q) = some prime no. Prime no have only two factors- 1 and the number itself.
now p+q cannot be 1 unless one of the either p or q is zero. Hence, p-q is 1. :) |
Loading... |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by komal
I think we have to stress on the fact that the points are all 'inside' the square and not'on' it. if they are inside option c is correct, right? if they were 'on' it, it would be possible that the distances may be equal but not less than root 2.
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by komal
The outcome of an experiment are represented by the points in the square bounded by x =
0, y = 0, x = 1, y = 1 in XY-plane. If probability is distributed uniformly, what is the probability that x^2 + y^2 > 1? a) (4 – pie)/4 b) pie/4 c) 0 d) None of the above. Please provide explanation too! |
Loading... |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
is d answr a)
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Preet
Answer is option A
So the r.v are represented as the bottom(base) and left side of a square. The entire area sums up to 1 (pdf sums to 1 when integrated over the entire range). Inside this, draw a quarter circle which represents x^2 + y^2 = 1. Now we want the probability represented by the area outside, ie to the right of the circle. So this is just 1 - Pi/4 |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Hargun
yeah if the pts are inside then the statement c is true , i guess i didn't read the ques properly On 5 Jul 2012 15:41, "Hargun [via Discussion forum]" <[hidden email]> wrote:
I think we have to stress on the fact that the points are all 'inside' the square and not'on' it. if they are inside option c is correct, right? if they were 'on' it, it would be possible that the distances may be equal but not less than root 2. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |